featured
featured

It's impressive to see just how far and how fast mobile computing has progressed within the last decade or so since it first became popular. Phones get bigger, faster, brighter, and do a lot more than any of us could have ever imagined. And here they are; big, bright, and fast, and at the point where they're about to pass the most powerful gaming consoles we have today when it comes to processing power.

Tony Tamasi, SVP of Content and Technology for Nvidia, recently predicted that the next generation of mobile devices rolling in will have processors that surpass those of popular gaming consoles like the PlayStation 3 and the Xbox 360. While it seems like that's a lot of processing power (because it is) it's not all that far-fetched of an idea due to the fact that the actual chipsets in those two particular consoles are actually 7 and 8 year old technology. In the mobile world, anything older than two years is considered ancient and would likely be comparable to a rock. Assuming the next rollout of mobile devices does indeed surpass current console technology, it's probably to be expected about this time considering that our mobile technology is only about ten years behind PC desktops.

Console systems normally last quite a bit longer than mobile technology does, so as long as our smartphones don't surpass the processor of a PS4 or the next gen Xbox then I think it's acceptable. Of course, the other half of the equation also plays an important role in how well a super speedy processor works, and that's the longevity of a device’s battery life once it's taken off life support - I mean charger.

Until we get more powerful batteries, a more powerful processor wouldn't do a whole lot of good. It would serve as nothing more than a battery sucker, which is why consoles and desktop PCs do so well in the first place with faster processors. They're huge gadgets that need to be constantly plugged in to a source in order to power on and even work. These devices were made to stay in one place constantly. But for the gadget on the move it's a little more difficult to find a solution that allows it to be both powerful and have decent battery life. Until that point, you're likely going to have to choose between one or the other.

Maybe I'm the only one that feels this way, but the way phones are now seem plenty fast to me. Everything is almost instant. Sure, you get the times where you grit your teeth and hold your phone tighter and give it the death stare because something is taking longer than normal (read: 5 seconds) to load. In the words of comedian Louis C.K., "Give it a second, it's sending signals to space!" I'm pretty sure no matter how fast or powerful the phone is we'll always get that impatient feeling when something takes longer than expected. We get used to something and anything out of the ordinary is just unacceptable.

To be fair, the same goes for battery life. You had flip phones and messaging phones that lasted 3-4 days varying on usage, and then you have the new smartphone owner who comes in three days after purchasing her brand new smartphone and complains because she's had to charge it 4 times already, stating there must be something wrong. I hate to be the bearer of bad news lady, but there’s nothing wrong with your phone. Welcome to the future! Your new best friend is a charger.

If I had to choose one, I’d pick battery life. Features have taken center stage over battery life for quite some time now, and I think features and apps have gotten to the point to where, for the most part, most new features are played out to be gimmicky. I don't really need Smart Scrolling or BlinkFeed. They're cool I suppose, but between the previously mentioned features and battery life, battery life would certainly be a lot more useful and practical to me.

What interests you more, readers? Would you rather see more powerful processors in phones and deal with shorter battery life, or do you think processors should wait until batteries have a chance to catch up? Let me know your thoughts!


Don't forget to VOTE! Each week, PhoneDog Fans vote for their #1 smartphone in the Official Smartphone Rankings. Vote now and contribute to the industry's most relevant weekly ranking charts


Related posts



Comments & discussions  

37 Reactions to this post

"More processing power or better battery life?"


Please limit your reaction to 140 characters or use comments for a longer reply :)
Add
Thanks for your participation! :)

Chad Johnson
Chad Johnson on the move battery life if not processing power
Kevin Joel
Kevin Joel Note II battery.
David Moreno
David Moreno Hands down battery life! Note 2 is a beast
Joel Diaz
Joel Diaz Better battery life
Gary Bowling
Gary Bowling Da fuq does XBOX and PS4 have to do with battery life?
Nikola Karovic
Nikola Karovic My Note2 have enough power for 1,5-3days
Marwan Ahmed
Marwan Ahmed Battery life
Shane Stenson
Shane Stenson Note 2 lol. Fast phone with a big battery =winwin
Paul Fairbrother
Paul Fairbrother I agree but can the mobile company's stand still for two years?
Jawon Chance
Jawon Chance You have to assume the more powerful the processor, the higher the power consumption is required. Battery.
Idris Hussain
Idris Hussain More Processing power with being more energy efficient.
Jeffrey Hanes
Jeffrey Hanes What a stupid question.
Magnus Larsson
Magnus Larsson Battery
Anthony Charles Boyd
Anthony Charles Boyd Both
Javier Delgado
Javier Delgado lol they need to stop...the display+CPU wars its going nowhere.....and improve battery life and software optimization... instead of getting a new phone cuz got 32 cores and display 7 inches wich is not longer a damm phone o_o
Matthew Swanson
Matthew Swanson Battery life! At some point processor speed becomes just a sales ghimmick.
Andrew Bissel
Andrew Bissel We need an even match to both.
Anthony Evans Jr
Anthony Evans Jr agreed!
Jerimiah Reece
Jerimiah Reece BOTH! :)
Brian Dominguez
Brian Dominguez I would like more battery but the processor needs some help too .__.
Haldi Kuniqi
Haldi Kuniqi the note 2 has a great battery and great speeds
Steve Johns
Steve Johns Both if it has a lot of processing power then stick a big ass battery in it im so sick and tired of all this thinnest and lightest phone ever bullshit make a phone thats powerful/fast/smooth and make it last longer then a day :)
Jose Angel Santiago
Jose Angel Santiago Battery life
CeeGii Borels
CeeGii Borels BATTERY, no amount of processing works without power
Anthony Bailey
Anthony Bailey Samsung seemed to have gotten this right with their latest generation of phones, specifically my Galaxy Note II. I don't have a processing issue, at all—Quad Core 1.8GHz Exynos Processor—and I sure as HELL don't have a battery life problem. I average about a 1½ days without a charge on my Note II, and many times I can get over 2 days. The most I've gotten with a high amount of use, is 86 hours and I am NOT rooted. Completely stock.
Jason Vargas
Jason Vargas Battery life
Dave Bourque
Dave Bourque you can't choose both... because one affects the other...
K.j. Littlejohn
K.j. Littlejohn Battery life
Lance Hill
Lance Hill Battery Life because its no longer a mobile device if you have to keep it plugged in!!!
Armando Aranda
Armando Aranda More battery life means more time to watch porn.
Gabriel Grey
Gabriel Grey Processing power gets my vote, both both won't hurt
Joe McDonough
Joe McDonough Processing
Dave Bourque
Dave Bourque battery life for my mobile device, processing power for my laptop/desktop gaming machines.
Allen Drewe
Allen Drewe At this point battery life. Phones do everything we need at the snap of a finger
Abram Wenevermet Dennis
Abram Wenevermet Dennis Battery life
Marius Frâncu
Marius Frâncu battery life as always
Amer Ahmed
Amer Ahmed How about both?




Most popular Videos
Most popular Videos
Most popular Videos

Most popular Reactions
Most popular Reactions
Most popular Reactions

This weeks "People's Choice Rankings" best smartphones
People's Choice Rankings


See all hot devices